Like any business, we need to have a sustainable model to continue to improve our products while maintaining important user protections. Maintaining our ability to invest in the ecosystem In the coming weeks and months, we will share implementation details for developers, including instructions for submitting security and customer service verifications and a set of user experience guidelines so users can make an informed choice. South Korean consumers value these features of Google Play’s billing ecosystem, and we believe it’s critical to continue to offer them the choice to use Google Play billing if they desire. And more than 12 million users in South Korea have enrolled in Play Points, collectively accruing over 20 billion points in their accounts, which they are unable to use on alternative billing systems. In fact, this year alone, more than 1.5 million users in South Korea have used Play gift cards. We work hard to keep users safe and maintain the experience they have come to expect from apps and games downloaded from Google Play. Alternative billing systems may not offer the same protections or payment options and features of Google Play's billing system-such as parental controls, family payment methods, subscription management, Google Play gift cards, and Play Points. ![]() At checkout, users will be able to choose which billing system to use. In response to the recent legislation, developers will now be able to add an alternative in-app billing system, alongside Google Play’s billing system, for their mobile and tablet users in South Korea. These changes will allow us to comply with the law, continue to invest in Android and Google Play, and provide the seamless, safe and trusted user experience billions of people expect from Google Play. We respect the decision of the National Assembly, and we are sharing some changes to respond to this new law, including giving developers that sell in-app digital goods and services the option to add an alternative in-app billing system alongside Google Play’s billing system for their users in South Korea. ![]() The South Korean government recently passed a law regarding app stores and billing systems for users in South Korea. What To Watch ForĪ California federal court is set to hear Epic’s claims against Apple on Monday and its ruling on the issue could set a precedent for how such issues are handled by lawmakers, courts and antitrust watchdogs around the world.Posted by Wilson White, Senior Director of Public Policy Google also offers a competitor to Spotify called YouTube Music. Music streaming platform Spotify has also accused Apple of antitrust violations for its 30% cut citing the fact that the iPhone-maker offers its own music streaming service, which doesn’t have to pay such a fee. Epic then sued both Apple and Google accusing the two tech giants of antitrust violations by using their marketplace dominance to stifle competition. While Android users were still allowed to install and run the game by “sideloading” the app from Epic’s website, Apple doesn’t offer iPhone users this ability. Last month, Epic’s Fortnite was kicked off both Apple and Google’s app stores for allowing its players to directly purchase items in the game, bypassing the 30% cut charged by both platform holders. Sweeney noted that Google would dissuade users attempting such an install with “scary” pop-ups warning them about the risks of viruses and malware. While speaking about this issue earlier this year, Tim Sweeney, the CEO of Epic Games, called Android a “fake open system” for adding barriers in front of users who wanted to install Epic’s popular game Fortnite directly from the company’s website, instead of the Play Store. While Google has allowed users to install third-party app stores on Android it would strongly discourage phone makers from doing so, citing security risks. Not only does this approach allow us to continuously reinvest in the platform, this business model aligns our success directly with the success of developers.” Chief Critic In its blog post, Google defended its approach stating that it only collects “a service fee if the developer charges users to download their app or they sell in-app digital items, and we think that is fair. ![]() ![]() App developers have long complained that Apple and Google use their dominance over the smartphone market to charge the hefty fee which makes it difficult for them to compete.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |